![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Отто Нойгебауэр
нашел страничку об этом одном из моих любимейших ученых:
http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Neugebauer.html
и вот, между прочим, тут интересно:
Neugebauer continued as editor of Mathematical Reviews until 1945 when a full-time executive editor was appointed. Neugebauer policy regarding reviews was an interesting one. He [1]:-
... always insisted that the length of the review was not intended to be directly proportional to the importance of the paper; indeed, a bad paper needed to have a review sufficiently detailed so that nobody needed to look at the paper itself, whereas a really important paper needed only to be called to the world's attention.
http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Neugebauer.html
и вот, между прочим, тут интересно:
Neugebauer continued as editor of Mathematical Reviews until 1945 when a full-time executive editor was appointed. Neugebauer policy regarding reviews was an interesting one. He [1]:-
... always insisted that the length of the review was not intended to be directly proportional to the importance of the paper; indeed, a bad paper needed to have a review sufficiently detailed so that nobody needed to look at the paper itself, whereas a really important paper needed only to be called to the world's attention.
no subject
no subject